Covid-19 and Social Media Language Change: A Perspective of Linguistic Determinism
Keywords:
linguistic relativity, linguistic determinism, social networking language,, Covid-19Abstract
The Sapir–Whorf theory portrays two standards. One is the standard of linguistic determinism, which says that the manner in which one believes is controlled by the language one talks (JW Neuliep, 2017). Taken at its extraordinary, this standard implies that, on the off chance that we don't have a word for it, at that point we can't consider it. The second is the standard of linguistic relativity, in some cases called linguistic variety, which says that the dialects of the world are altogether totally different. These standards raise some significant issues for cross‐cultural correspondence. Contemporary language specialists qualify the Sapir–Whorf speculation. This paper aims to investigate the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the thought processes and usage of language of social media users. The data has been collected from Facebook and analyzed according to The Analysis Model (based on Szurawitzki (2010). The exploration on the topic unveiled those online users are significantly affected by the pandemic that expresses and shares their thought processes using precise language as a medium of communication. The outcome of the study advocates that language is ominously affected when thought processes change their course.
References
Ali, S. H., Foreman, J., Capasso, A., Jones, A. M., Tozan, Y., and DiClemente, R. J. (2020). Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC medical research methodology, 20, 1-11.
Ampong, G. O., Mensah, A., Adu, A. S., Addae, J. A., Omoregie, O. K., and Ofori, K. S. (2018). Examining Self-Disclosure on Social Networking Sites: A Flow Theory and Privacy Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 8(6), 58.
Baig, Y. A. (2019). A Discourse Analysis of Speeches Delivered by the Prominent Indian Politicians on Important Official Forums, Linguistics and Literature Review 5(1): 49- 61. Boroditsky, L. (2011). How Language Shapes Thought. Scientific American. 304. 62-5. 10.1038/scientificamerican0211-62.
Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62-65.
Boroditsky, L. (2016). How Does Our Language Shape The Way We Think?. [online] Edge. Available at: https://www.edge.org/conversation/how-does-our-language-shape-the-way-we-think
Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(4), 503-522.
Chen, J., Liang, D., Zhu, Z., Zhou, X., Ye, Z., & Mo, X. (2019, October). Social media popularity prediction based on visual-textual features with xgboost. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 2692-2696).
Chung, C. K., and Pennebaker, J. W. (2014). Using computerized text analysis to track social processes. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (p. 219–230). Oxford University Press.
De Cruz, H. (2009). Is Linguistic Determinism an Empirically Testable Hypothesis? Logique Et Analyse, 52(208), Logique et Analyse, 52(208), 327-341..
De Smith, M. J. (2018). Statistical Analysis Handbook A Comprehensive Handbook of Statistical Concepts, Techniques and Software Tools/Dr Michael J de Smith, 2018, The Winchelsea Press. The Winchelsea Press.
Gauvain, M., and Parke, R. D. (2010). Socialization. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of cultural developmental science (p. 239–258). Psychology Press.
Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.013.037
Hurlburt, R. T. (2011). Investigating pristine inner experience: Moments of truth. Cambridge University Press.
Hussein, B. A. S. (2012). The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis today. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 642-646.
Jäger, S., and Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 34-61.
Mahmud, A., & Amin, R. (2017). Use of social networking media in political participation: A study on Dhaka university students. Sociology and Anthropology, 5(6), 481-488.
Neuliep, J. W. (2017). Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis. The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, 1-5.
O Dea, B. & Boonstra, T. and Larsen, M. & Nguyen, T. & Venkatesh, S. & Christensen, H. (2018). The relationship between linguistic expression and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts: A longitudinal study of blog content.
O'Neill, S. P. (2015). Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-10.
Rashid, F. (2018): Image Making of Pakistan in Fiction After 9/11: Critical Discourse Analysis of Thinner than Skin by Uzma Aslam Khan, Linguistics and Literature Review 4(2): 91-104.
Settanni, M. and Marengo, D. (2015). Sharing Feelings Online: Studying Emotional Well-Being via Automated Text Analysis of Facebook Posts. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1045. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01045.
Smith, B. G., Smith, S. B., & Knighton, D. (2018). Social media dialogues in a crisis: A mixed-methods approach to identifying publics on social media. Public relations review, 44(4), 562-573.
Szurawitzki, M. (2012). Analyzing the language of social networking sites-An analysis model. In Proceedings of 24th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (pp. 355-363).
Tadesse, M. M., Lin, H., Xu, B., and Yang, L. (2018). Personality predictions based on user behavior on the facebook social media platform. IEEE Access, 6, 61959-61969.
Tausczik, Y. and Pennebaker, J. (2010). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 29. 24-54. 10.1177/0261927X09351676.
Tomlinson, M.T., Hinote, D.R., and Bracewell, D.B. (2013). Predicting Conscientiousness through Semantic Analysis of Facebook Posts. ICWSM 2013.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 144-161.
Wang, Y. Do We Know More About Whorf?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 215-223, jan. 2016. ISSN 2200-3452. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.1p.215.
Whorf, B. L., and Carroll, J. B. (1984). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New media & society, 13(5), 788-806.
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London; NewYork: Continuum.
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2015). Language may indeed influence thought. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01631
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zaira Khawar, Dr. Huma Batool, Dr. Ayyaz Qadeer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
